This is an archived USAID document retained on this web site as a matter of public record.
Administrator J. Brian Atwood
National Council for International Health
Washington, D.C., June 12, 1997
U.S. Agency for International Development
I want to thank you for the opportunity to share my hopes
and concerns with you at this important gathering. Over the next
three days, you will hear about an array of issues relating to the
state of global health and the role the United States can and
should play in addressing them.
You will share valuable experiences and insights -- and
participate in a two-way exchange that has the potential to benefit
the people of the United States as much as those living in
developing countries.
This is a time of great concern about international health
issues. But it is also a time of opportunity if we work together.
We can usher in a 21st century that is healthier, more peaceful
and more prosperous than the century we are about to leave
behind.
Let me give you some reasons to be optimistic:
-- Vitamin A research, supported consistently by USAID
over the course of two decades, now provides humanity
with a proven tool that can save a million children's
lives a year at mere pennies a dose.
-- We have already eradicated polio from the Western
Hemisphere. We can turn polio from a public menace
into an obscure reference -- familiar only to trivia and
history buffs.
-- We will eradicate guinea worm, which has been a huge
drain on the productive capacity of many developing
nations.
-- Perhaps we will find a cure for ebola or the AIDS virus
if we continue to invest in research.
But you know that even these accomplishments are far from
inevitable.
To secure advances of this scale, our nation must make
sound, forward-looking public investments. Those who
understand the challenges -- everyone in this room and your
colleagues -- must convince the American public and decision
makers that prevention is far cheaper than treatment once disease
has struck.
I also want to encourage you to join in the effort to broaden
support for sustainable development. The next time you hear
someone question what Americans get out of foreign aid, point
out USAID's role in eradicating polio throughout the world.
Tell them that, in addition to ending the suffering, crippling
and lives lost to that terrible disease, Americans will save a lot of
money. When polio is finally eradicated everywhere, the United
States will save the $234 million a year which we currently spend
to immunize our own children against polio.
These are not one-time savings -- they will continue forever,
just as the savings on smallpox immunizations have continued
since we eradicated that communicable disease in the 1970s.
The remarkable progress in spreading the benefits of health
advances to the developing world has been possible because of
the worldwide sharing of best practices, innovations and insights.
USAID also believes in sharing what we have learned
abroad with communities in the United States which have similar
problems, a philosophy I know NCIH has long embraced.
That philosophy is embodied in USAID's Lessons Without
Borders program. Through it, Baltimore officials learned that 80
percent of Kenya's two-year-olds were immunized against
childhood diseases, compared to 56 percent of Baltimore's.
Using methods city officials had observed in Kenya, Baltimore
conducted a mass immunization program. Now, 96 percent of
Baltimore's school-age children have documented immunizations.
Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) is another example of a
health measure that can benefit Americans although it was
designed to solve problems in developing countries. USAID
supported the original research and development of ORT, which
has saved millions of lives in developing countries. American
pediatricians now recommend ORT's widespread use in this
country to save millions of dollars and much needless
hospitalization and suffering.
Global health problems cannot be solved by health research
and programs alone, however. As Vice President Gore noted at
NCIH last year, our world is interconnected in ways
unimaginable just a short time ago.
An effective response to the challenges of improving the
health of people around the world therefore demands U.S. action
in areas not generally considered health related. Many of these
issues will be discussed at the first session of this conference --
The U.S. Government's Role in Promoting Global Health --
coming up in a few minutes. Each of us brings something to the
table:
-- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have
special expertise in surveillance and outbreak response.
-- The National Institutes of Health have unique skills in
researching diseases and therapies.
Both are essential to deal with diseases that could pose major
threats to public health both at home and abroad. Yet, dramatic
as the development of heart bypass, organ transplants and other
medical miracles have been, it was not those high tech
innovations that brought about the greatest increases in
Americans' lifespans and health.
It was immunizations and basic health, together with clean
water and public sanitation systems -- and the simple
understanding of the importance of everybody, but especially
doctors, washing their hands.
If something happened to disrupt America's water and
sanitation systems, medical science could not keep up with the
resulting havoc.
Clean water, sanitation and basic health are equally essential
to conquering disease in developing countries. Ambulances and
emergency rooms are the last steps, not the first, in dealing with
health problems. You can't dial 911 to deal with root causes
and prevention, or to affect early and cost-effective interventions.
Since 1961, developing countries have been able to call on
our agency for help. USAID's unique role is to deal with the
root causes of disease and prevent diseases from becoming
imminent threats to the health of people around the world.
Many of you have experience with USAID's great strength
-- our presence on the ground, working with host countries, other
donors, and the private sector. This presence allows USAID to
program health and population resources from a variety of places
within a total development context. That strength, we believe, is
critical to ensuring that host countries feel real ownership and are
also able to sustain these activities within their own resources.
Development issues well beyond the realm of health
systems, surveillance and response are fundamental to global
health and to USAID's strategies in the developing world. They
also play a crucial role in protecting the health of Americans.
When the Institute of Medicine expert committee released its
seminal report on Emerging Infections in 1992, it did the world
an immense service. The report highlighted a very important
point: emerging infections are not driven by happenstance; they
are precipitated by a clear set of underlying factors.
Among the key determinants cited in this report were two
groups of factors I want to highlight: first, human demographics
and behavior; and second, economic development and land use.
These factors can feed broad social and political decay, systemic
underdevelopment and foster emerging infections.
USAID programs that help prevent conflict, environmental
degradation and rapid population increases directly tackle the root
conditions that allow a society's health to deteriorate.
As the Institute of Medicine report pointed out, rapidly
growing populations and increasing population density in today's
"megacities" provide a fertile breeding ground for new and
reemerging organisms.
That is one of the reasons why USAID's thirty-year
commitment to voluntary family planning remains crucial both to
development and to combatting major public health threats.
This year, as we observe the 10th anniversary of the Safe
Motherhood Initiative, we are reminded that the health and
survival of mothers is central to the well-being of children.
Where USAID has family planning programs, women bear
an average of three children instead of six. Both mothers and
children are healthier and survive longer where there are
sufficient intervals between births.
Smaller families are better cared for, better educated, have
better nutrition, are more productive economically, and are less
vulnerable to everything from diarrheal diseases to dengue fever.
Within our broad commitment to reproductive health, family
planning is an integral part of USAID efforts to assist in
improving health for people around the world.
We cannot assure the health of children by focusing on
childhood diseases alone. It is not enough even when we broaden
the focus to other diseases which have a major impact on
children, such as malaria and HIV/AIDS, important as they are.
Conflicts that produce massive and sudden migrations of
entire populations, such as we have seen in Rwanda, also trigger
epidemics.
Our programs dealing with democracy and governance and
with economic growth provide an important bulwark against the
failure of states and imploding of societies that have contributed
so much to disease, malnutrition and death in the developing
world.
The rapid changes underway in the global economy pose
risks as well as opportunities never before faced. This is why
our economic development programs are increasingly tied to our
health concerns.
A dam that would allow expansion of irrigation and power
generation might once have been seen only as good. It may not
be a sound investment, however, if its creation changes the flow
of a river and thereby spreads disease vectors such as snails that
carry schistosomiasis.
Logging and rapid deforestation may provide a quick profit
for the few. But the longer term cost could be catastrophic for
the many who would come in contact with previously unknown
organisms -- such as ebola or, prior to that, HIV.
We all know that microbes and disease are not stopped by
national borders -- the hard-won lessons of experience should not
be either. To be effective in combatting a new generation of
diseases, our approaches and solutions must be transnational.
Global warming and climate change may introduce disease
carrying vectors to new areas where millions may be at risk.
Much of the discussion about climate change has centered on food
supplies and the potential disappearance of beaches and low-lying
cities like Miami and New York.
You in this room also understand that global warming could
expand the territories of many deadly and disabling diseases now
endemic only in tropical areas of developing countries. Diseases
like malaria and yellow fever could become endemic in what are
now the temperate zones of the United States and Europe.
You here today are uniquely qualified and positioned to
make these relationships clear to the public and decision-makers.
USAID should not have to defend our programs in family
planning, the environment, economic growth and democracy
against people concerned solely about child survival and
infectious disease. Cutting funds for other development programs
on which child survival and infectious disease control also depend
makes little sense.
I recognize that those of you in this audience have a
particular commitment to health and to health systems. We share
that commitment. We will continue our longstanding efforts to
strengthen these systems, and to build local capacity and the
commitment of our development partners to manage these systems
for the long haul. These efforts are at the heart of our strategy of
sustainability.
In the worst of all possible worlds, USAID's various
committed constituencies could be reduced to competing for
priority and attention. I know that your common commitment is
to help the people of the developing world, rather than to attack
in isolation any particular symptom of poverty and
underdevelopment.
As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Marshall Plan
which helped rebuild Europe after World War II, General George
Marshall's words in announcing that proposal still resonate today:
"Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine,
but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. Its purpose
should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to
permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which
free institutions can exist."
As we prepare for a new century, USAID fights hunger,
poverty, desperation and chaos to help developing countries build
working economies that permit the emergence of political and
social conditions in which free institutions can exist. But today
we do not fight alone. The nations the United States helped half
a century ago are now are strong partners in the fight.
To achieve our mutual goals we must strengthen these
strategic alliances and multilateral coalitions. We must bring
together community, private and public agencies, NGOs, public
health professionals and volunteers -- the bedrock of international
development.
Together we can find common ways to overcome obstacles,
and focus the attention of Americans on all the good bought by
their foreign aid dollars.
We must make our common case with passion and
commitment. We must help the American people and their
legislators -- some of them coming here tomorrow morning --
understand how important our work beyond our own borders has
become to this nation.
Again, I congratulate NCIH on all you have done to spread
this critical message.
Together, we can make sure that those most at risk
share the benefits of both past and future advances. Together, we
can build the systems that will hold back new disease threats.
We have no time to lose.
I pledge to you my best efforts in our mutual cause of
combatting illness and human suffering around the world. I know
I can count on yours. Thank you.
This is an archived USAID document retained on this web site as a matter of public record.
 |
Last Updated on: July 18, 2001 |