Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People - Link to USAID Home Page Frontlines USAID's 50th Anniversary

  Press Home »
Press Releases »
Mission Press Releases »
New Developments »
Fact Sheets »
Media Advisories »
Speeches and Test »
Development Calendar »
Evidence Summits »
Reports to Congress »
Photo Gallery »
FrontLines »
Contact
USAID
»
 
 
Inside this Issue
Food Security
Search



Your Voice: ‘The Food Crisis Isn’t Going Away’

FrontLines - June 2009

By Nina Fedoroff

Your Voice, a continuing FrontLines feature, offers personal observations from USAID employees. Nina Fedoroff is the science and technology adviser to both the Secretary of State and the Administrator of USAID. This column was excerpted from a letter Fedoroff wrote to Andrew C. Revkin, a New York Times reporter whose blog—dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com—covers environmental issues.


Feb. 27, 2009 [posted on blog March 3]

Photo by USAID
Nina Fedoroff

Dear Andy,

I write you from the far frozen north of Norway. Near the village of Longyearbyen, on the island of Spitzbergen, is a remarkable structure called the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. In chambers deep in a mountain whose temperature never rises above freezing is a storage chamber, further cooled to a temperature of—15 degrees Celsius. In it are seeds of some 70,000 varieties of the 64 of the world’s major food crops. Marking the Vault’s first anniversary, a small scientific meeting focused on how climate change will affect humanity’s ability to grow food.

It’s cold here. But a deeper chill settled on us as we listened to the climate scientists’ scenarios for the coming decades.

Even if we all stopped driving, flying, and turned every light out tomorrow, the CO2 we’ve already poured into our atmosphere over last 100 years means that [the] next hundred will be much hotter than the last 100.

It seems we’ve begun to absorb the notion of hotter, drier summers, rising sea levels, and more extreme weather—bad enough. But who’s thought much about what a changing climate might mean at the grocery store? No matter whose projections, no matter whether the best, worst, or most probable scenario, our crops will suffer— and I mean OUR crops, not just those in some distant land.

Here’s a real example of what a higher temperature can do. In 2003, France and Italy had a summer that was just 3.5 percent hotter than their usual summer. It rained as usual, but the yields of major crops were still down by 20 to 36 percent. Projections show that this will be the average summer by 2090.

And within the next few decades, it’s nearly certain that we’ll be recording summer[s] hotter than ever recorded. Many of our crops fail completely if the temperature goes much above 100 degrees Fahrenheit for just a few days at a critical flowering time. During my days as a corn geneticist, I watched the tassels turn brown and sterile [as] the summer hit 108 degrees in Columbia, Mo., at pollination time.

To put this in perspective: the food crisis of 2008 called attention to how close we are to the limits of the global food supply. But unlike the financial one, the food crisis isn’t going away. This is because the number of people on the planet is still growing and by mid-century we’ll need to roughly double the food supply—which, of course, starts with growing crops, whether to feed us, or to feed pigs and cows and chickens. Yet the amount of land on the planet that’s good for growing crops hasn’t changed much for more than half a century.

Will the warming climate open lands for cropping farther north? Probably, though how much is uncertain. What is quite certain by now is that climate change will squeeze those farther south as soil moisture declines. This will affect the most populous countries, countries whose populations are growing fastest.

So what do we do? The Global Crop Diversity Trust (www.croptrust.org/main/arctic.php), which funds the Vault, is dedicated to the preservation of the genetic diversity in our food crops. They are motivated by the belief that it is this diversity that will be the source of the genes we will need to develop plants that can grow on a hotter, drier planet.

Maybe. But the fact is that over the entire (more than) 10,000-year history of agriculture, the CO2 levels in the atmosphere were between 180 and 280 ppm [parts per million]. We’re at 389 now.

It’s not unlikely that we’ll hit 700 ppm before we get this problem under control. That’s going to mean that it’ll get hotter and drier than anything but desert plants have seen before. Desert agriculture isn’t new, but scaling it up will be a challenge and may mean venturing outside the limits of our current stable of crops.

I rather think we should also be scrambling to explore and understand organisms—not just plants—that have evolved to survive and thrive in the parts of the earth that are already the hottest and driest. We’ll need to understand how they survive. We’ll need to capture the genes that make it possible. If we’re lucky, we’ll be able to use these to arm some of our super-productive crops plants to survive and thrive under such conditions. If we’re lucky. And if people stop being so reluctant to use modern molecular science to enhance crops.

 


FrontLines is published by the Bureau for Legislative and Public Affairs
U.S. Agency for International Development

To have FrontLines delivered to you via postal mail, please subscribe.

Material should be submitted by mail to Editor, FrontLines, USAID,
RRB, Suite 6.10, Washington, DC 20523-6100;
by FAX to 202-216-3035; or by e-mail to frontlines@usaid.gov

To view PDF files, download
the Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Back to Top ^

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star