Exhibit 300 FY2008

FY2008 Exhibit 300

PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION

In Part I, complete Sections A, B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-IT). Complete Sections E and F for IT capital assets.

Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets)

The following series of questions are to be completed for all investments.

I. A. 1. Date of Submission:
2006-06-15

I. A. 2. Agency:
184

I. A. 3. Bureau:
15

I. A. 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
(short text - 250 characters)
IT Security Line of Business

I. A. 5. Unique ID: (For IT investments only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system.)
184-15-02-01-01-2100-00

I. A. 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2008?
(Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M ONLY in FY2008, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2008 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.)
E-Gov LoB Oversight

I. A. 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this, closes in part or in whole, an identified agency performance gap:
(long text - 2500 characters)
The ISS LOB investment was established through the efforts of an OMB sponsored security task force. The objective of the ISS LOB is to leverage best practices throughout the Federal government for implementing the Federal Information Security Act (FISMA) and improving cyber security. The task force identified four specific security areas as candidates for ISS Centers of Excellence (COE), Security Awareness Training, Situational Awareness and Incident Response (SAIR), FISMA Reporting, and Selection, Evaluation and Implementation of Security Solutions (Security Solutions/Lifecycle). The OMB ISS LOB Exhibit 300, dated August 5, 2005, directs each Agency to either propose their intention to become a COE or to submit migration plans to procure security services from a COE. This OMB Exhibit 300 supports USAID's joint proposal (partnering with the Department of State) to become a shared service center for Security Awareness Training. This Exhibit 300 supplements the Statement of Capabilites Proposal submitted to the Department of Homeland Security on September 14, 2006. USAID has proven security practices that meet all the attributes identified by the ISS LOB. In February 2005, USAID was the first Agency to receive an A+ on the Federal Computer Security Report Card by the House Government Reform Committee. USAID was able to repeat this success with another A+ and become the only Federal Agency with a perfect score of 100 . The COE solutions provided in this business case include the promotion and adoption of USAID best practices to improve the effectiveness of information security across the federal government.

I. A. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?

yes

I. A. 9. a. If "yes", what was the date of this approval?
2006-08-03

I. A. 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?
yes

I. A. 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.

yes

I. A. 12. a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?
yes

I. A. 12. b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)

I. A. 12. b. 1. If "yes", is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment?

I. A. 12. b. 2. If "yes", will this investment meet sustainable design principles?

I. A. 12. b. 3. If "yes", is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code?

I. A. 13. Does this investment support one of the PMA initiatives?

yes

I. A. 13. a. If "yes", check all that apply:

I. A. 13. b. Briefly describe how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s).
(medium text - 500 characters)
Strategic Management of Human Capital This investment will provide direction, support and resources to government professionals with security roles and responsibilities. Use of common solutions will reduce and/or eliminate duplication of effort an

I. A. 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?

(For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)

I. A. 14. a. If "yes", does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?

I. A. 14. b. If "yes", what is the name of the PARTed Program?
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 14. c. If "yes", what PART rating did it receive?

I. A. 15. Is this investment for information technology? (see section 53 for definition)
yes

I. A. 16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?
Level 1 - Projects with low-to-moderate complexity and risk. Example: Bureau-level project such as a stand-alone information system that has low- to-moderate complexity and risk. Level 2 - Projects with high complexity and/or risk which are critical to the mission of the organization. Examples: Projects that are part of a portfolio of projects/systems that impact each other and/or impact mission activities. Department-wide projects that impact cross-organizational missions, such as an agency-wide system integration that includes large scale Enterprise Resource Planning (e.g., the DoD Business Mgmt Modernization Program). Level 3 - Projects that have high complexity, and/or risk, and have government-wide impact. Examples: Government-wide initiative (E-GOV, President's Management Agenda). High interest projects with Congress, GAO, OMB, or the general public. Cross-cutting initiative (Homeland Security).
Level 3

I. A. 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per OMB's PM Guidance):
(1) - The project manager assigned for this investment has been validated as qualified in accordance with OMB PM Guidance.; (2) - The project manager assigned for this investment is in the process of being validated as qualified in accordance with OMB PM Guidance.; (3) - The project manager assigned for this investment is not validated as qualified in accordance with OMB PM Guidance.; (4) - The qualifications for the project manager named have not been evaluated.; (5) - No project manager is currently assigned for this investment.; (6) - N/A -- This is not an IT investment.
(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

I. A. 18. Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4 - FY 2006 agency high risk report (per OMB's "high risk" memo)?
no

I. A. 19. Is this a financial management system?

I. A. 19. a. If "yes", does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?

I. A. 19. a. 1. If "yes" which compliance area?
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 19. a. 2. If "no", what does it address?
(medium text - 500 characters)

I. A. 19. b. If "yes", please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. A. 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2008 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

I. A. 20. a. Hardware
25

I. A. 20. b. Software
25

I. A. 20. c. Services
50

I. A. 20. d. Other
0

I. A. 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?
n/a

Section B: Summary of Funding

I. B. 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table.

All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing and partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

	PY-1 and Spending Prior to 2006	PY 2006	CY 2007	BY 2008
Planning	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Acquisition	$0.00	$0.00	$0.03	$0.03
Subtotal Planning & Acquisition	$0.00	$0.00	$0.03	$0.03
Operations & Maintenance	$0.00	$0.00	$0.02	$0.02
TOTAL	$0.00	$0.00	$0.05	$0.05
Government FTE Costs	$0.00	$0.00	$0.15	$0.15
Number of FTE represented by cost	$0.00	$0.00	$1.20	$1.20

I. B. 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?

yes

I. B. 2. a. If "yes", How many and in what year?
(medium text - 500 characters)
2 in FY08. It is anticipated that most support can be provided by contractors.

I. B. 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2007 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
(long text - 2500 characters)

Section D: Performance Information

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative or qualitative measure.
Agencies must use Table 1 below for reporting performance goals and measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table can be extended to include measures for years beyond FY 2006.

I. D. 1. Table 1
(Character Limitations: Strategic Goal(s) Supported - 250 Characters; Performance Measure - 250 Characters; Actual/baseline (from Previous Year) - 250 Characters; Planned Performance Metric (Target) - 250 Characters; Performance Metric Results (Actual) - 250 Characters; Measurement Indicator - 250 Characters; Baseline - 250 Characters; Planned Improvement to the Baseline - 250 Characters; Actual Results - 250 Characters)

I. D. 2. Table 2

Fiscal Year	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
2007	Mission and Business Results	Security	Key Asset & Critical Infrastructure Protection: Standardization baseline lowers overall risk to Federal Government	# of weaknesses reported in POA&M	Reduce # of weaknesses reported in POA&M by 10%	TBD
2007	Mission and Business Results	Security	Key Asset & Critical Infrastructure protection: Increased situational awareness and incident response	# of agencies using situational awareness and response solutions	Increase # of agencies using situational awareness and incident response solutions by 10%	TBD
2007	Mission and Business Results	Workplace Policy Development And Management	Resource Training & Development: Establishing baseline of security training	Current cost of ISS training	Reduce cost per seat by 10% for user training	TBD
2007	Mission and Business Results	Workplace Policy Development And Management	Resource Training and Development for Baseline training	# of relevant course offerings	Increase in # of course offerings by 10%	TBD
2007	Processes and Activities	Financial Management	Cost Savings/avoidance due to elimination of redundancies	$ per seat spent on info security	Decrease in $ spent per seat on info security by 10%	TBD
2007	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Improved quantity of C&A performed	% systems have completed C&A	Increase in % of systems with a completed C&A by 10%	TBD
2007	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Decrease in cost of C&A performed	$ spent performing C&A	Decrease in $ spent performing C&A by 10%	TBD
2007	Customer Results	Customer Satisfaction	Service or Product Delivery meets government standards	# of ISS solutions meeting baseline configuration standards	Increase in # of solutions meeting baseline configuration standards by 10%	TBD
2007	Customer Results	Customer Satisfaction	# of security professionals in Federal Government satisfied with adequacy and applicability of security training and tools available	X% of customer help/requested inquiries/calls/emails resolved within Y timeframe	Improvement in X% of customer help/requested inquiries/calls/emails resolved and/or in Y timeframe	TBD
2008	Customer Results	Information Management	# of agencies migrated to ISS LBO COE's	X Agencies migrating to ISS LOB COE	10% agencies migrating to ISS LOB COEs	TBD

Section F: Enterprise Architecture (EA)

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Invesment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

I. F. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?

yes

I. F. 1. a. If "no", please explain why?
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. F. 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?

I. F. 2. a. If "yes", provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.
(medium text - 500 characters)

I. F. 2. b. If "no" please explain why?
(long text - 2500 characters)
This investment is designed to support a line of business not initiate a new system. USAID has not identified any new procedures or standards that would impact or change existing EA.

I. F. 3. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

FEA SRM Component - Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW" component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM. FEA Service Component Reused - A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Porject Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission. Internal or External Reuse? - 'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service comonent provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government. Funding Percentage - Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service. (Character Limitations: Agency Component Name - 250 Characters; Agency Component Description - 500 Characters)

Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	FEA SRM Service Type	FEA SRM Component	FEA Service Component Reused - Component Name	FEA Service Component Reused - UPI	Internal or External Reuse?	BY Funding Percentage
Security Awareness Training	Skills Management	Human Capital / Workforce Management	Education / Training	Data Warehouse	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	4
Security Awareness Training	Project Management	Customer Relationship Management	Program / Project Management	Business Rule Management		No Reuse	4
Security Awareness Training	Information Sharing	Knowledge Management	Knowledge Distribution and Delivery	Digital Signature Management		No Reuse	15
Security Awareness Training	Project Management	Management of Processes	Configuration Management	Business Rule Management		No Reuse	4
Security Awareness Training	Project Management	Management of Processes	Change Management	Business Rule Management		No Reuse	4
SAIR	Project Management	Management of Processes	Program / Project Management	Business Rule Management		No Reuse	4
SAIR	Information Sharing	Knowledge Management	Knowledge Distribution and Delivery	Digital Signature Management		No Reuse	7
SAIR	Intrusion Detection and Incident Response	Security Management	Intrusion Detection	Multi-Lingual Support	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	10
SAIR	Intrusion Detection and Incident Response	Security Management	Intrusion Prevention	Multi-Lingual Support	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	12
SAIR	Intrusion Detection and Incident Response	Security Management	Incident Response	Multi-Lingual Support	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	11
SAIR	Certification & Accreditation	Security Management	Certification and Accreditation	Multi-Lingual Support	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	13
SAIR	Intrusion Detection and Incidence Response	Security Management	Virus Protection	Multi-Lingual Support	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	8
SAIR	Project Management	Management of Processes	Configuration Management	Business Rule Management	184-15-02-01-02-2020-04	Internal	4

I. F. 4. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

FEA SRM Component - Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications. Service Specification - In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate. (Character Limitations: Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name) - 250 characters)

FEA SRM Component	FEA TRM Service Area	FEA TRM Service Category	FEA TRM Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
Intrusion Detection	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Independent	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Local Area Network (LAN)	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Network Devices / Standards	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Storage	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Intrusion Detection	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	COTS: Cisco Secure IDS
Incident Response	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Other Electronic Channels	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Independent	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Application Servers	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Dependent	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COTS: netForensics
Incident Response	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COTS: netForensics
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Access Channels	Web Browser	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Channels	Intranet	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Channels	Internet	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Channels	Virtual Private Network (VPN)	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Service Requirements	Authentication / Single Sign-on	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Independent	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Web Servers	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Portal Servers	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Local Area Network (LAN)	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Dependent	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	COTS: nCircle
Risk Management	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COTS: nCircle
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Other Electronic Channels	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Other Electronic Channels	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Internet	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Hosting	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Dependent	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Web Servers	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Application Servers	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Embedded Technology Devices	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Embedded Technology Devices	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Embedded Technology Devices	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Embedded Technology Devices	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Static Display	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Interface and Integration	Integration	Middleware	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day
Education / Training	Service Interface and Integration	Integration	Middleware	GOTS: Security Tips of the Day

I. F. 5. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?

yes

I. F. 5. a. If "yes", please describe.
(long text - 2500 characters)
As a service provider, USAID will promote the use of existing applications/components.

I. F. 6. Does this investment provide the public with access to a government automated information system?

I. F. 6. a. If "yes", does customer access require specific software (e.g., a specific web browser version)?

I. F. 6. a. 1. If "yes", provide the specific product name(s) and version number(s) of the required software and the date when the public will be able to access this investment by any software (i.e. to ensure equitable and timely access of government information and services).
(medium text - 500 characters)

PART IV: FOR "E-GOV AND LINES OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT" ONLY

Part IV should be completed only for investments which in FY08 are considered an E-Gov initiative or a Line of Business (LOB), i.e., selected the "E-Gov and LOB Oversight" choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments currently identified as "E-Gov and LOB Oversight" will complete only Part I and IV of the exhibit 300.

Section A: E-Gov and Lines of Business Oversight (All Capital Assets)

Multi-agency initiatives, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300.

IV. A. 1. Stakeholder Table

As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

Partner Agency	Joint exhibit approval date
024	8/16/2006

IV. A. 2. Partner Capital Assets within this Investment

Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution; Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B. (Character Limitations: Partner Agency Asset Title - 250 Characters)

Partner Agency	Partner Agency Asset Title	Partner Agency Exhibit 52 UPI (BY2008)
024	TBD	024-65-02-00-01-2100-24

IV. A. 3. Partner Funding Strategies ($millions)

For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the "Partner Funding Strategies Table": the name(s) of partner agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank.)

Partner Agency	Partner Exhibit 53 UPI (BY2008)	CY Contribution	CY Fee-for-Service	BY Contribution	BY Fee-for-Service
024	024-65-02-00-01-2100-24	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

Métier | work forward
Powered by WorkLenz
© Copyright. Métier, Ltd. 1999-2007. All rights reserved.
Patent Pending Application Numbers: 09/334,256;09/536,378;09/536,383;7,062,449;60/642,983;11/090,038
Version 5.0