Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People Transition Initiatives USAID's 50th Anniversary
Transition Initiatives Home »
About Transition Initiatives »
Country Programs »
Summary of Program Activities »
Lessons Learned »
Publications »
Staff »
Employment »
Links »
Frequently Asked Questions »
Site Map »
Transition Initiatives Country Programs: Rwanda

OTI / Rwanda Home

Summary Page (Nov. 2000)

Summary Page (May 1999)

Women In Transition (WIT) Description

Photo Gallery

Evaluation of OTI's WIT Initiative in Rwanda [PDF, 275k]

Get Acrobat Reader...

Search the Transition Initiatives site
Search



Transition Initiatives: Rwanda Women in Transition (WIT)

Update: September 1999

Evaluation of WIT

In May-June 1999, a program evaluation of the WIT Project was carried out. The evaluation was coordinated by USAID's Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) and implemented by DevTech Systems/Washington D.C. One of the primary objectives of the evaluation was to comment on the efficacy and importance of the WIT Program and explore the questions if WIT should continue, under what status, and for how long. The evaluation team visited 13 communes, heard 160 women associations report on their funded activities, conducted 11 focus groups, held round table discussions with 19 NGOs, and met with numerous national and international officials over a one month period.

The evaluation concluded that much of WIT's success is due to the staunch support from OTI/Washington and WIT's unusual form, i.e., a programming unit with flexibility and adaptability that is nurtured under a partnership between USAID and the Ministry of Gender and Women in Development. The Ministry's influence at the communal and prefecture level helps ensure local support and transparency. USAID's umbrella protects WIT from possible undue external influences and ensures U.S. government standards in managing resources that enables WIT to quickly reach and support isolated and impoverished areas throughout the country. The evaluation concluded that because of the often lukewarm relationship between NGOs and the Rwandan Government, placing WIT under an international NGO could create a different and less positive working relationship with the Ministry and rural authorites. Spinning WIT off as an independent national NGO would limit its effectiveness and ultimately its reach. WIT is not ready to function independently as a micro credit institution, and the search for funds would hamper program delivery. The evaluation recommended that WIT continue in its present form for a 3-5 year period and then be re-evaluated to determine if a need still exists, and whether it would be appropriate to change its form at that time. This extension would enable WIT to engage in a medium to long-term strategy, which it has been unable to do in the past, due to yearly funding and the prior undetermined impact of the program.

EVALUATIONS' LESSONS LEARNED:

Some of the lessons learned place the results and impact of the Women in Transition program in the broader context of transition policy and OTI programming worldwide. These lessons grow directly out of the Rwanda experience, but should influence OTI's activities elsewhere in the world.

  • Activities which promote and increase women's economic empowerment can lead to political participation.
  • Economic activities, particularly in groups and associations, contribute to the reduction of tension and the creation of unity in post-conflict settings.
  • Activities which require that women assume non-traditional roles in one area help them to acquire the necessary confidence and self esteem to take on other non-traditional roles.
  • When women are seen as leaders and individuals with the capacity to assist others to address their problems, they can be elected to positions which would otherwise be filled by men.
  • Working in a post-conflict or post-genocide setting requires flexibility and adaptability in programming. Many of OTI's current mechanisms should be used as a model by USAID itself, to better meet the needs of transition environments. To remain relevant, USAID needs to develop more flexible mechanisms for project implementation.

WIT's FUTURE:

Following the evaluation and audit of the WIT program, WIT submitted a two-year proposal to USAID/Rwanda for 2000 and 2001. If WIT is funded, it foresees a continuation of supporting rural women associations and other vulnerable groups throughout Rwanda and gradually diminishing funding activities in the prefectures/communes initially targeted.

In 2000 and 2001, new consideration will be given to women in prefectures that were not initially targeted by WIT's operations, and communes that could not be reached because of past insecurity. This strategy will respond to vulnerable women, particularly in western Rwanda, who have received little if any assistance for their basic needs and priorities.

Another cornerstone of WIT's future strategy will be its work with and training of rural Women Committees and Women's Communal Funds (WCF). The creation of the WCF is an effort by the Ministry to decentralize and ensure the extension of revolving credit to rural women at the commune and sector levels. It is also a dual effort to give rural-elected Women Committees and women structures more involvement in funding determinations and management decisions. The broad amount of field experience that WIT staff has gained over the past three years equips them with invaluable know-how and skills to provide guidance, training and assist in the establishment of appropriate mechanisms and procedures for WCFs. WIT has already started working with and training WCFs in 17 communes. Over the next two years, it estimates it will work with and fund between 30 to 45 new WCFs.

WIT TODAY:

As of the first week of September 1999, WIT has worked in 91 communes in 11 prefectures. It has funded 1,581 women projects for nearly $3 million dollars. The total number of beneficiaries is 179,218. Program data and charts are available upon request.

If WIT is funded for the next two years, a new Coordinator will be recruited. The new Coordinator will be more involved in training and hopefully have expertise with micro credit activities in developing countries.

COMMENTS ABOUT WIT:

"This funding (WIT's) is not charity, but an investment in your future as you work for peace and prosperity. I know you have struggled through many hardships, and my wish is that you can live and work in peace. You deserve to have peace."

—COS Dick McCall addressing 18 WIT-funded women associations in Northwest Rwanda, December 1998

"WIT funds are especially helpful to women because they go directly to the associations and do not pass through other intermediaries...this gives associations absolute responsibility in managing their funds and activities...I encourage other NGOs, donors and even the Rwandan Government to use WIT's model in providing assistance to Rwandans...I hope that WIT's assistance will encourage other women to join or form associations as a unified means of dealing with their problems..."

—Gisenyi Prefect, Captain Jean-Baptiste Muhirwa, addressing WIT-funded women associations in Mutura Commune, Gisenyi Prefecture, December 1998

"...when I arrived three years ago, part of my mandate as Ambassador to Rwanda was to help support the reconciliation process...the Women In Transition Program has played a key part in Rwanda's reconciliation process..."

—Ambassador Robert E. Gribbin's farewell address to USAID/Rwanda  Staff, December 1998

"Women will need additional support to be effective advocates for peace and unity at the local level. WIT staff could have a greater impact on women's political participation with additional training and support."

—Evaluation Report of Women In Transition Project, June 1999

"Most USAID programs work throughlocal and international NGOs to deliver programs. WIT is an exception to this approach, and indicates a real commitment to reaching remote areas and especially vulnerable groups. The rural focus of the WIT program means that assistance goes directly to rural women=s associations, without the multiple intermediaries and associated delays which are more typical of assistance to rural communities."

—Evaluation Report of Women In Transition Project, June 1999

Back to Top ^

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star