Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People Transition Initiatives USAID's 50th Anniversary
Transition Initiatives Home »
About Transition Initiatives »
Country Programs »
Summary of Program Activities »
Lessons Learned »
Publications »
Staff »
Employment »
Links »
Frequently Asked Questions »
Site Map »
Transition Initiatives Country Programs: Honduras

OTI / Honduras Home

Program Summary (Nov. 2000)

Program Summary (May 1999)

Country Reports

 

Photo Gallery

Search the Transition Initiatives site
Search



Transition Initiatives: Honduras Field Report

November 16 - December 31, 1999


Country Situation

A newspaper closely associated with the governing Liberal Party printed accusations that the US government had delayed or changed plans to assist Honduras due to its perception of corruption. The US Ambassador responded forcefully that this is not true, and that the USG is one of the largest donors to Honduras today, and is certainly the most active in multi-sector Mitch relief. OTI's activities are one part of that assistance, albeit a highly visible part.

The Tribuna articles may have been an attempt to draw attention away from other papers' accusations against government ministries. One of the Government of Honduras agencies against whom allegations are directed is SOPTRAVI (the Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Housing). On Nov. 18, SOPTRAVI published a long, defensive letter in the Tribuna attempting to defend the Ministry against charges of nepotism and corruption. SOPTRAVI's main defense in the letter was that there are no laws against nepotism in Honduras and so the cited appointments were not technically illegal. Moreover, SOPTRAVI noted, even if they were illegal, not all the appointments were made by the Ministry (some were made by the President), so all the accusations are therefore false. Perceptions of corruption linger.

OTI-funded activities have also encountered problems with this GOH agency, whose officials have attempted to pressure International Organization of Migration (OTI's implementing partner for the Tegucigalpa Exit Program) into contracting SOPTRAVI to undertake work. IOM has always put all work out to bid and has regularly ended up paying private contractors only 10% (or less) of the price SOPTRAVI quoted.

OTI Highlights

A. Narrative Summary

OTI recently contracted PARTICIPA, a highly respected Chilean NGO, to undertake its long-awaited Civil Society and Transparency Survey in Honduras. The survey will provide an inventory of civil society groups working on transparency and accountability at the national and local levels, and will assess the ability of these organizations to carry out a monitoring or oversight role nationally. The assessment will also seek to determine what role, if any, USAID can play in strengthening these efforts. Unfortunately, Honduran civil society has traditionally been underdeveloped, especially in comparison with other Latin American and Central American countries. There is a demand at various levels of civil society for expanded participation in the reconstruction program – both in terms of administration and oversight – but it is not yet clear how realistic these demands are. USAID/Honduras has a very strong municipal development program that is working closely with OTI on the survey. The Mission has significant resources to invest in transparency, and the OTI survey will provide information on the capacity of civil society groups to work in this arena, as well as plan coordination with other donors' activities. The PARTICIPA team will arrive in Honduras on January 10, 2000.

The USAID Mission is also involved in another OTI-supported initiative – the Donor Oversight Mechanism, approved by the Government of Honduras – which gives donors enhanced ability to track their funds through the various government agencies to implementation of activities. OTI played a crucial role in the early negotiation of this initiative, providing vital support to the Mission Controller.

B. Grants Activity Summary

The OTI Tegucigalpa Exit Program to help victims of Mitch leave the capital city's public shelters has fully approved nine grants to receive OTI funding, assisting a total of 2,220 families of whom 1,593 will be our direct beneficiaries. OTI has obligated $1,220,600 to these nine grants, leveraging $8,442,880 in other donors' funding and beneficiary contribution.

At this time, however, only 370 families are already living on the site of their permanent housing, and only 77 are already in that permanent housing. Two projects are completed. One other small project is well under way, and should accept its first families in January. Four large projects are breaking ground and preparing for construction, which is scheduled to begin early next year.

There are an additional four to six additional projects with which OTI expects to sign contracts early next year. Some of these are completed housing projects that have space and have agreed to take on OTI beneficiaries in exchange for infrastructure support from OTI and the USAID Mission. Others are larger projects with whom OTI and IOM are still clarifying the amount and kinds of assistance needed.

C. Coordination

OTI's Exit Program is being executed in tight coordination with the USAID Mission, OFDA, and with NGOs doing project implementation. One of the Exit Program's greatest strengths (and its greatest weakness in terms of rapid implementation) is that everything depends on coordinating with and assisting other donors and implementers. OTI funding helps implement these projects more rapidly and ensures that our beneficiary population (the most vulnerable) receive prioritized assistance. Before OTI intervened, NGOs were focussed on the needs of other populations, those with whom they have worked longer, and had not prioritized the families in the public shelters.

OTI continues to represent USAID at the Group of Five Housing Coordination Group. The Group of Five was formed as a result of the donors' meeting in Stockholm, where five major donors to Honduras (the United States, Canada, Spain, Sweden and Germany) banded together to ensure adherence to principles of transparency and coordination. The Group has since been expanded to include UNDP, the IDB and Japan. The housing meetings also include ECHO, IOM, and other important implementers.

D. Implementation Issues

The main impediments to rapid implementation have been the complexity of the projects (especially as they all attempt to provide a social framework as well as a roof), and the weak legal structure of Honduras. This weak legal structure has meant that none of the lands on which OTI has sought to build housing have had uncontested titles. It has also meant that GOH environmental regulations are being tightly imposed on these projects (for poor people who lack legal and political clout), although they are less rigorously enforced on businesses.

The weather is finally cooperating after an unusually long and wet rainy season, and the political and legal problems are finally being resolved, but it has taken longer than it should have.

Next Steps/Immediate Priorities

The first major relocation of families to permanent housing sites supported by OTI took place in November as 203 damnificado (i.e., flood-victim) families were relocated from a soccer field to the Altos de Santa Rosa site. The families are now living and working on their land as OTI carries out the massive movement of earth necessary to prepare the land for the construction of permanent housing there. The second major movement of damnificado families is scheduled for January 2000, when some 100 families will be relocated from a public shelter to the Habitat for Humanity construction site. This will be the first relocation financed and carried out completely by OTI/IOM. If that relocation goes well, families will be moved shortly thereafter to the CARITAS housing site and then to the ADRA site.

The relocation of these families is complicated since OTI and IOM need to fully prepare the areas first, in coordination with the NGO. The beneficiaries need to have the same conditions they enjoyed in the public shelters: water, light, sanitation, security, etc. The movement is strictly voluntary and the full 100 families may not chose to move at once, but as they leave, their cubicles at the public shelter (which are built in long galleries consisting of strings of cubicles) will be destroyed. This will be a moment ripe with symbolism since no one thought that the beneficiaries would ever leave the shelters. Both the local and national governments have credited the OTI Exit Program with making this possible.

Progress Towards Objectives

OTI is beginning to phase out its presence in Honduras. The OTI Resident Manager is scheduled to leave in January/February 2000, with OTI activities to be managed by the USAID Mission with OTI technical assistance when necessary. All agreements have been negotiated, and the program appears prepared for the handover.

Back to Top ^

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star