Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People - Link to USAID Home Page Europe and Eurasia USAID's 50th Anniversary

E&E Quick Links
E&E Home »
Countries »
Our E&E Work »

Working Papers
Download Adobe Reader to view PDF Files

Search Europe and Eurasia
 

Search



Monitoring Country Progress Methodology

There exist two overlapping MCP systems differentiated primarily by different data sources.  One focuses on the E&E countries and draws on E&E region-specific indicators in some dimensions.  The other system is our more recently-developed global MCP system which uses data generally available across all regions of the world.  The core of each of these systems consists of five dimensions and five corresponding indices.  We highlight the MCP Global system below:

(1) Economic reform includes trade liberalization, fiscal reform, government effectiveness and commitment, macroeconomic (regulatory quality) reforms, and microeconomic (business environment) reforms.

(2) Governing justly and democratically includes rule of law and judicial reform, anti-corruption reforms, independent media reforms, civil liberties (and the development of civil society), and political rights (and the development of free, fair, and competitive elections).

(3) Macroeconomic growth and performance includes macroeconomic stability (inflation, current account balance, and external debt); per capita economic growth and its distribution (income inequality); and key economic structural indicators (including the size and competitiveness of the export sector, energy security, environmental sustainability, financial sector reform, and net inflows of foreign direct investment).

(4) Investing in people includes health outcomes (life expectancy, under-five mortality rates, and environmental health); education trends (functional literacy and combined education enrollment rates); public expenditures on education and health; per capita income; and gender inequality (reproductive health, proportion of females in parliament, and the proportion of females in the labor force).

(5) Peace and security includes measures of counter-terrorism (the severity of terrorism and the capacity of government to prevent it); combating weapons of mass destruction (government’s capacity to control the export of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons); stabilization operations and security sector reform; counter-narcotics (demand and supply of opiates, cocaine, cannabis, and amphetamines); combating transnational crime (including money laundering, trafficking in persons, and piracy of intellectual property rights); and conflict mitigation (including the potential for political instability, conflict history, and the instability of neighboring countries).

Method of analysis

MCP draws on publicly available, standardized (i.e., cross-country) data from a variety of sources including international organizations such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF); various U.S. government sources and reports (such as from USAID, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Defense Department, and U.S. Trade Representative); as well as think tanks and universities such as Freedom House, Transparency International, Fund for Peace, Binghamton University, and George Mason University.

For each index, primary data are converted to a 1 to 5 scale, where a 1 represents the worst country performances on that indicator worldwide and a 5 represents the best worldwide. Three indices (economic reforms, governing justly and democratically, and peace and security) are calculated by equally weighting the components. The weighting schemes for the other two indices (economic growth and performance, and investing in people) are more complex and attempt to reflect an iterative process of analysis and feedback among many colleagues in the U.S. government and beyond. The figures below provide the specifics of the weighting schemes for each of the five indices.

A Pie chart depicting MCP Governing Justly and Democratically index weights.  All elements: Corruption, Political Rights, Civil Liberties, Media Freedom, and Rule of Law receive 20% weight
pie chart depicting MCP Economic Reforms index weights.  All elements: Trade Liberalization, Business Environment, Regulatory Quality, Government Effectiveness, and Budget Balance receive 20 percent weight
A pie chart depicting MCP economic performance index weights.  Domestic credit 11%, gdp growth per capita 22%, fdi 11%, inflation 4%, current account balance 4%, debt 4%, high tech exports as a percentage of total exports 3%, manufactured exports as a percenage of total exports 3%, export share of gdp 5%, gdp per unit of energy 5%, percentage of energy use imported 6%, uneven development 11%, environmental sustainability 11%
A pie chart with the MCP investing in people index weights.  Weights are as follows: Gender 14%, Under five mortality 8%, life expectancy 8%, health expenditure as a percentage of gdp 4%, environmental health 8%, literacy rate 11%, education expenditure as a percentage of gdp 6%, combined enrollments 12%, per capita income (PPP) 29%
A pie chart showing the division of peace and security index.  Inputs are weighted by the following percentages: Counter Terrorism 17%, Combating Weapons of mass destruction 17%, Stabilization operations and security sector reform 17%, counter narcotics 17%, transnational crime 17%, and conflict mitigation 17%

A key aspect of the MCP system’s method of analysis is the visual analytical tools.  Four standard visual tools, illustrated below, are commonly used: (1) the development profile chart; (2) scatterplots; (3) the development gap (web) chart; and (4) trend analysis.

profile chart depicting the five MCP indices and Russia vs the Europe and Eurasia average. Russia performs below the EE average on all five indices A scatter plot of Latin American and Caribbean countries plotted using economic and democratic reforms composite index scores. Bolivia is highlighted and is below the threshold markers depicted in the graph.
A web chart measuring India against the Asian average on the five MCP economic reform indexes: Business environment, Regulatory Quality, Government Effectiveness, Budget Balance, and Trade liberalization graph depicting phase out analysis of sample country using economic and democratic reforms. Using the arithmetic mean of the previous five years the country is projected to pass the 3.5 threshold in 2016.

Back to Top ^

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star